{"batch_id":"A5a-B1","items":[{"id":"1.1","ledger_line":7,"is_correction":false,"corrected_claim":null,"evidence_quotes":[{"line":8,"quote":"Work: names the modal strengthening between claims 2 and 5 (Movement Four)."}],"reason":"Records a model quotation and its manuscript use, with no check against a primary source."},{"id":"1.2","ledger_line":10,"is_correction":false,"corrected_claim":null,"evidence_quotes":[{"line":11,"quote":"Work: the refusal to infer CEO belief states from public disclosure (Movement Four)."}],"reason":"Logs a quotation and its location in the compilation, not a primary-source verification."},{"id":"1.3","ledger_line":13,"is_correction":false,"corrected_claim":null,"evidence_quotes":[{"line":14,"quote":"Work: the unequal-denominator and selection argument (Movement Four)."}],"reason":"Records an argument quoted from an answer, with no external source checked."},{"id":"1.4","ledger_line":16,"is_correction":true,"corrected_claim":"That FinanceBench (arXiv:2311.11944) shows GPT-4-with-context answering roughly 79–86% of document QA questions correctly, evidencing that LLMs read filings competently on grounded tasks.","evidence_quotes":[{"line":17,"quote":"GPT-4-with-context ≈ 79–86% on document QA"},{"line":17,"quote":"Work: the reversed benchmark example (Movement Seven). See entry 3.2 for the benchmark's verified result."},{"line":122,"quote":"GPT-4-Turbo used with a retrieval system incorrectly answered or refused to answer 81% of questions."}],"reason":"The figure was checked against the verified FinanceBench abstract, which reports the result in the opposite direction."},{"id":"1.5","ledger_line":19,"is_correction":true,"corrected_claim":"That arXiv:2407.17866 was withdrawn after replication found \"inconsistencies and potential look-ahead leakage\", attributing a cause the official withdrawal notices do not state.","evidence_quotes":[{"line":20,"quote":"was withdrawn in 2024 after replication found inconsistencies and potential look-ahead leakage"},{"line":20,"quote":"Work: first of two instances of a cause added beyond the official withdrawal notice (Movement Seven)."},{"line":117,"quote":"arXiv notice (fetched)"},{"line":118,"quote":"neither notice states a cause; no cause is asserted"}],"reason":"The added cause was checked against the fetched withdrawal notices, which state none."},{"id":"1.6","ledger_line":22,"is_correction":false,"corrected_claim":null,"evidence_quotes":[{"line":22,"quote":"Method note stating no live search and unverifiable post-cutoff literature"},{"line":23,"quote":"Work: acknowledged uncertainty carried alongside exact figures in the same answer (Movement Seven)."}],"reason":"Records a model's self-reported method note, not an assertion checked against a source."},{"id":"1.7","ledger_line":25,"is_correction":true,"corrected_claim":"That arXiv:2411.09630 is Sarkar & Vafa, \"Look-Ahead Bias in LLM Stock Predictions\", dated 2024-11-14.","evidence_quotes":[{"line":25,"quote":"Sarkar & Vafa, Look-Ahead Bias in LLM Stock Predictions, arXiv:2411.09630 2024-11-14"},{"line":26,"quote":"Work: the mis-assigned identifier example (Movement Seven). See entry 3.3."},{"line":127,"quote":"Verified via the INSPIRE-HEP API record and alphaXiv"},{"line":128,"quote":"the identifier supports nothing concerning look-ahead bias in stock prediction"}],"reason":"The identifier was resolved against verified records and returns an unrelated physics paper."},{"id":"1.8","ledger_line":28,"is_correction":true,"corrected_claim":"That the 2012 study cited for \"management forecasts systematically dominate analyst forecasts\" is by Hutton, Lee, & Matsumoto; the verified third author is Shu.","evidence_quotes":[{"line":28,"quote":"Hutton, Lee, & Matsumoto, 2012"},{"line":29,"quote":"Work: author variant in the Hutton example (Movement Seven). See entry 3.4."},{"line":132,"quote":"Citation fields confirmed: authors, journal, volume 50, issue 5, pages 1217–1244."},{"line":133,"quote":"the file variants it corrects are at Source A lines 165/175 (authors)"}],"reason":"The author attribution was checked against the verified bibliographic record and found wrong."},{"id":"1.9","ledger_line":31,"is_correction":true,"corrected_claim":"That Hutton, Lee & Shu (2012) appeared in Journal of Accounting Research 50(2); the verified issue is 50(5), pp. 1217–1244.","evidence_quotes":[{"line":31,"quote":"Journal of Accounting Research 50(2)"},{"line":32,"quote":"table line 1379 (wrong issue number)"},{"line":132,"quote":"volume 50, issue 5, pages 1217–1244"},{"line":133,"quote":"1379 (issue)"}],"reason":"The issue number was checked against the verified record and found wrong."},{"id":"1.10","ledger_line":34,"is_correction":false,"corrected_claim":null,"evidence_quotes":[{"line":35,"quote":"Identified in the manuscript as visible planning text, never as a submitted answer."},{"line":35,"quote":"Work: the export's own record of acknowledged citation uncertainty (Movement Seven)."}],"reason":"Holds planning text as background material rather than an assertion checked against a source."},{"id":"1.11","ledger_line":37,"is_correction":false,"corrected_claim":null,"evidence_quotes":[{"line":38,"quote":"Identified in the manuscript as visible planning text. Work: as 1.10."}],"reason":"Records planning text with its file context, with no primary-source check in this entry."},{"id":"1.12","ledger_line":40,"is_correction":false,"corrected_claim":null,"evidence_quotes":[{"line":41,"quote":"Work: the separate-events passage (Movement Four)."}],"reason":"Paraphrases answer content and lists parallel locations, without verifying any assertion."},{"id":"1.13","ledger_line":43,"is_correction":false,"corrected_claim":null,"evidence_quotes":[{"line":44,"quote":"Work: underpins the surviving-claim limits (Movement Four) and the attribution requirement (Movement Eight)."}],"reason":"Records a quoted reasoning boundary used in the manuscript, not a source check."},{"id":"2.1","ledger_line":48,"is_correction":false,"corrected_claim":null,"evidence_quotes":[{"line":49,"quote":"Work: first rung of the forensic proposal series (Movement Six)."}],"reason":"Logs a quotation and a note on where the quotation was cut."},{"id":"2.2","ledger_line":51,"is_correction":false,"corrected_claim":null,"evidence_quotes":[{"line":52,"quote":"Work: names the forensic family (Movement Six)."}],"reason":"Records a single quotation with its line reference and manuscript use."},{"id":"2.3","ledger_line":54,"is_correction":false,"corrected_claim":null,"evidence_quotes":[{"line":55,"quote":"Work: the answer's own speculation label on its central premise (Movement Six)."}],"reason":"Notes the answer's self-description; no assertion is checked against a primary source."},{"id":"2.4","ledger_line":57,"is_correction":false,"corrected_claim":null,"evidence_quotes":[{"line":58,"quote":"Work: the counting argument tested in Movement Six."}],"reason":"Paraphrases an argument from an answer without recording a source verification."},{"id":"2.5","ledger_line":60,"is_correction":false,"corrected_claim":null,"evidence_quotes":[{"line":61,"quote":"Work: closing fact of Movement Five."}],"reason":"Records the answer's own wording and its position in the file, not a verified correction."},{"id":"2.6","ledger_line":63,"is_correction":false,"corrected_claim":null,"evidence_quotes":[{"line":64,"quote":"Work: second rung of the forensic series (Movement Six)."}],"reason":"Logs two quotations with their line references and manuscript use."},{"id":"2.7","ledger_line":66,"is_correction":false,"corrected_claim":null,"evidence_quotes":[{"line":67,"quote":"Work: third rung (Movement Six)."}],"reason":"Records a quotation and its location, with no primary-source check."}]}