Start with the archive
The Studies page is the primary archive surface, bringing together current working papers, committed instruments, and preserved legacy records.
Open pagePublic research archive
Founded by Richard Foster-Fletcher, it publishes restrained, citable records on how AI changes organisational judgement, governance, reporting, and deployment. The archive is built to be read carefully, cited properly, and checked against its stated evidence standard.

The Studies page is the primary archive surface, bringing together current working papers, committed instruments, and preserved legacy records.
Open pageThe Research map groups the published record by the questions it addresses, so readers can move across connected studies rather than isolated posts.
Open pageThe evidence standard states what enters the archive, how records are versioned, and how corrections and scope limits are handled.
Open pageInstrument
Committed instrument, 6 July 2026
The committed prompt set and coding scheme for a comparative output-coding study of model responses to senior strategic prompts.
Working paper
Published July 2026
A public-record study of how large organisations require, incentivise, and formalise AI engagement through mandates, incentives, training, workflow integration, and board-level expectation.
Working paper
Published July 2026
A study of how senior executives at large organisations may reach AI capability beyond the tools their institutions formally sanction.
Working paper
Published July 2026
A documentary study of whether major board-governance and AI-oversight frameworks require anyone to know the organisation-authored system prompt shaping an enterprise AI deployment.
Working paper
Published July 2026
A documentary reading of seven enterprise AI deployments showing that public administration and compliance documentation does not recognise executive rank as a query-time basis for varying the governed layer.
Working paper
Published July 2026
A reading of the public terms for seven enterprise AI services. Across all seven vendors, the contracts make the customer responsible for AI output. The same contracts describe controls that affect that output: filters, system instructions, safety features, retrieval rules, data masking, and classifiers. The clauses that assign responsibility do not mention those controls.
Existing published inquiry and examination URLs remain in place. Where a record first appeared under an earlier archive section, that original address is preserved and still serves as the canonical public citation point.
The record should stay stronger than the narrative built on top of it.